The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2007-1154•Opposition No. 92/045,643) INTERNATIONAL FLORA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. v. Desert Whale Jojoba Company, Inc.
2007-1154Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitSep 10, 2007
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1154
(Opposition No. 92/045,643)
INTERNATIONAL FLORA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,
Appellant,
v.
DESERT WHALE JOJOBA COMPANY, INC.,
Appellee.
Geoffrey S. Kercsmar, The Kercsmar Law Firm, P.C., of Scottsdale, Arizona,
argued for appellant. On the brief was Douglas W. Gilmore, Noblitt & Gilmore, LLC, of
Scottsdale, Arizona.
Dale F. Regelman, Chandler & Udall, LLP, of Tucson, Arizona, for the appellee.
With him on the brief was Quan L. Nguyen.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office
Trademark Trial & Appeal Board
-- 1 of 2 --
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1154
(Opposition No. 92/045,643)
INTERNATIONAL FLORA TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,
Appellant,
v.
DESERT WHALE JOJOBA COMPANY, INC.,
Appellee.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, DYK, Circuit
Judge).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: September 10, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.