The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2007-1146•Federal Circuit disposition — 2007-1146
2007-1146Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 18, 2007
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1146
(Serial No. 10/064,380)
IN RE MICHAEL L. BEIGEL, NATHANIEL POLISH,
STEVEN R. FRANK, and ROBERT E. MALM
Robert E. Malm, Robert E. Malm Law Offices, of Pacific Palisades, California, for
appellant.
Nathan K. Kelley, Associate Solicitor, Solicitor’s Office, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, for appellee. With him on the briefs were
Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, and Thomas W. Krause, Associate Solicitor.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals
and Interferences
-- 1 of 2 --
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1146
(Serial No. 10/064,380)
IN RE MICHAEL L. BEIGEL, NATHANIEL POLISH,
STEVEN R. FRANK, and ROBERT E. MALM
JUDGMENT
ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
In CASE NO(S). Serial No. 10/064,380
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36
Per Curiam (NEWMAN, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges).
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: October 18, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.