The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2007-1110•M.e.s., Inc. v. John E. Potter, POSTMASTER GENERAL
2007-1110Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitSep 7, 2007
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1110
M.E.S., INC.,
Appellant,
v.
John E. Potter, POSTMASTER GENERAL,
Appellee.
Timothy A. Sullivan, Payne Hackenbracht & Sullivan, of Fort Washington,
Pennsylvania, argued for appellant.
A. Bondurant Eley, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division,
United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With her on
the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director,
and Donald E. Kinner, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Michael F. Kiely,
Law Department Civil Practice, United States Postal Service, of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals
Administrative Judge Norman O. Menegat
-- 1 of 2 --
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1110
M.E.S., INC.,
Appellant,
v.
John E. Potter, POSTMASTER GENERAL,
Appellee.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals
in CASE NO(S). 4462
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE, AND MOORE, Circuit Judges.).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED: September 7, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly, Clerk
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.