The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2006-1406•Honeywell International v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp. [errata]
2006-1406Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitAug 10, 2007
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
ERRATA
August 10, 2007
Appeal Nos. 2006-1406,-1435
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.
Decided: July 3, 2007 Precedential Opinion
Change the opinion as follows:
• Replace “the angular direction of an object” on page 8, line 15, with “direction.”
• Omit “angular” on page 8, line 16.
• Replace “angular direction of the runway line from a point on that runway” on
page 8, lines 17–18, with “direction of the runway itself.”
With these changes, the two affected sentences should read as follows:
The specification and prosecution history both make clear that the patentees
used the term “heading” to refer to direction from a point on a runway. Thus, the
“heading of the aircraft” is the direction of the aircraft from a point on a runway, and the
“heading of the runway” is the direction of the runway itself.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.