The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2006-1111•1112 Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. THE QUEST GROUP (doing business as Audioquest)
2006-1111Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitDec 13, 2006
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
06-1111,-1112
MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THE QUEST GROUP
(doing business as Audioquest),
Defendant-Cross Appellant.
__________________________
DECIDED: December 13, 2006
__________________________
Before GAJARSA, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and MOORE, Circuit
Judge.
PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.
On the basis of District Judge Patel’s thorough claim construction, Monster Cable
Prods., Inc., v. The Quest Group, No. 04-0005 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2005), and her
comprehensive analysis of the infringement issues, both literal and under the doctrine of
equivalents, Monster Cable Prods., Inc., v. The Quest Group, No. 04-0005, 2005 WL
1875466 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2005), and after considering the parties’ briefs and
arguments, we affirm the appealed judgment of the district court in all respects. In
addition, we affirm the district court’s rulings on the issues raised in the cross-appeal.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.