Kálmángyöry v. Reebok International, Ltd.

2004-1516Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 14, 2005

Full text

NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is
not citable as precedent. It is a public record.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
04-1516
KÁLMÁN GYÖRY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
REEBOK INTERNATIONAL, LTD.,
Defendant-Appellee.
__________________________
DECIDED: February 14, 2005
__________________________
Before MAYER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Circuit
Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Kálmán Györy (“Györy”) appeals the dismissal of his suit against Reebok
International, Ltd. (“Reebok”) for alleged infringement of United States Patent No.
4,134,156 (“the ’156 patent”). Györy v. Reebok Int’l Ltd., No. 03-CV-10077 (D. Mass.
June 4, 2004). We affirm.
With the benefit of an earlier application, Györy’s ’156 patent claimed priority
from June 11, 1976, and it issued on January 16, 1979. Under 35 U.S.C. § 154(c)(1),
the term of the ’156 patent expired on June 11, 1996. Györy commenced this action on

-- 1 of 2 --

January 6, 2003. Because “no recovery shall be had for any infringement committed
more than six years prior to the filing of the complaint,” 35 U.S.C. § 286, and because
an act must be performed “during the term of the patent” to constitute an act of
infringement, 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Györy cannot recover and his complaint was properly
dismissed for failure to state a claim. We have considered Reebok’s request for
attorney fees, and we decline to award them.
04-1516 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.