The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2004-1303•1316 PURITAN-BENNETT CORP. and MALLINCKRODT INC. v. PENOX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ESSEX INDUSTRIES, INC.
2004-1303Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 17, 2005
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition
is not citable as precedent. It is a public record.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
04-1303, -1316
PURITAN-BENNETT CORP. and MALLINCKRODT INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PENOX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ESSEX INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Defendants-Cross Appellants.
__________________________
DECIDED: February 17, 2005
__________________________
Before RADER, Circuit Judge, PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and PROST, Circuit
Judge.
PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.
The judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Indiana is affirmed on the basis of the thorough opinion of the trial court. See Puritan-
Bennett Corp. v. Penox Techs., Inc., No. IP 02-0762-C-M/S (S. D. Ind. Mar. 2, 2004).
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.