The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2003-1285•Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp. [errata]
2003-1285Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitApr 12, 2005
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
E R R A T A
April 12, 2005
Appeal No. 03-1285,-1313 Smithkline Beecham v Apotex Corp.,
Majority Precedential Opinion
Decided: April 8, 2005
In the majority opinion, page 4, third line from the bottom:
Delete the word “anhydrate” and insert in its place “hemihydrate”
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.