USA v. Keeo Miller

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-11743
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KEEO MILLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cr-00169-LGW-CLR-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 23-11743 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 07/24/2023 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 23-11743
Before R OSENBAUM , NEWSOM , and BRASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, as duplicative of ap-
peal no. 20-10194. Keeo Miller again appeals his final criminal judg-
ment, but we already affirmed that judgment in January 2023. See
United States v. Arlt, 567 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th Cir. 1978) (providing
that an appellant “is not entitled to two appeals” from the same
order or judgment). Although Miller apparently now wishes to
challenge his sentence, which he did not do in his original appeal,
he was required to “raise all claims of error in a single appeal fol-
lowing final judgment on the merits.” See Firestone Tire & Rubber
Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368, 374 (1981); see also United States v. Curry,
760 F.2d 1079, 1079 (11th Cir. 1985) (“In a criminal case the final
judgment means the sentence. The sentence is the judgment.”).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
other applicable rules.
USCA11 Case: 23-11743 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 07/24/2023 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --