The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-11255•Lena Lindberg v. George Maxwell, III, et al
23-11255Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 25, 2023
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-11255
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
LENA MARIE LINDBERG,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GEORGE W. MAXWELL, III,
Attorney/Senior Judge,
CHRISTINA MARIE SANCHEZ SERRANO,
Domestic Violence Injunction Judge,
GEORGE C. TURNER, JR.,
WILLIAM DAVID DUGAN,
Circuit Judges,
MICHELLE L. NABERHAUS,
Family Judge, et al.,
USCA11 Case: 23-11255 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 05/25/2023 Page: 1 of 3
-- 1 of 3 --
2 Opinion of the Court 23-11255
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cv-01587-RBD-DCI
____________________
Before WILSON , R OSENBAUM, and B RASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. The statutory time limit required Lena Lindberg to file a no-
tice of appeal on or before May 18, 2022, which was 30 days follow-
ing the date judgment was deemed entered on the district court’s
November 18, 2021 dismissal order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); Fed. R.
App. P. 4(a)(7)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). However, Lindberg did not file a
notice of appeal until April 8, 2023.
Additionally, there is no basis in the record for relief under
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). Accord-
ingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our ap-
pellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296,
1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of
appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot
entertain an appeal that is out of time).
USCA11 Case: 23-11255 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 05/25/2023 Page: 2 of 3
-- 2 of 3 --
23-11255 Opinion of the Court 3
All pending motions are denied as moot. No petition for re-
hearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other
requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
USCA11 Case: 23-11255 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 05/25/2023 Page: 3 of 3
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.