The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-13876•USA v. Trenton Edward Watkins
22-13876Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJun 13, 2023
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-13876
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TRENTON EDWARD WATKINS,
Defendant- Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00291-TFM-N-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-13876 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 06/13/2023 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 22-13876
Before J ORDAN, BRASHER , and B LACK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Barre Dumas, appointed counsel for Trenton Watkins, has
moved to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Watkins’s revocation of
supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-13876 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 06/13/2023 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.