The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-12779•USA v. Stephen Charles Setter
22-12779Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 12, 2023
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-12779
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEPHEN CHARLES SETTER,
Defendant- Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 4:20-cr-00060-RSB-CLR-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-12779 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 05/12/2023 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 22-12779
Before J ORDAN, NEWSOM , and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Andrew S. Johnson, appointed counsel for Stephen Charles
Setter in this appeal following his conviction on one count of arson,
and his resultant sentence of 60 months’ imprisonment, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pur-
suant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the rela-
tive merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examina-
tion of the record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s mo-
tion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Setter’s conviction and sen-
tence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-12779 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 05/12/2023 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.