The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-12678•USA v. Robert Lee Smith, III
22-12678Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 11, 2023
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-12678
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT LEE SMITH, III,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cr-00011-WLS-TQL-4
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-12678 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 05/11/2023 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 22-12678
Before LAGOA, BRASHER, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
D. Nicole Williams, appointed counsel for Robert Lee
Smith, III, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw
from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursu-
ant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent exam-
ination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s convic-
tion and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-12678 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 05/11/2023 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.