The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-11170•USA v. Brian James Hulse
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-11170
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRIAN JAMES HULSE,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00214-TFM-C-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11170 Date Filed: 09/30/2022 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
22-10470 Opinion of the Court 2
Before L UCK , LAGOA , and B RASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Brian Hulse in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hulse’s revocation of supervised
release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-11170 Date Filed: 09/30/2022 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.