The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-10753•USA v. Benjamin Eugene Walter
22-10753Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitApr 5, 2023
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-10753
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BENJAMIN EUGENE WALTER,
Defendant- Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00073-AKK-GMB-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10753 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 04/05/2023 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 22-10753
Before WILSON, J ORDAN, and B RANCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Perry Russel Steen, appointed counsel for Benjamin Eugene
Walter in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walter’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-10753 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 04/05/2023 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.