The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-13047•USA v. Constantino Charrez
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-13047
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CONSTANTINO CHARREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 4:20-cr-00022-AW-MAF-1
USCA11 Case: 21-13047 Document: 42-1 Date Filed: 08/30/2023 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 21-13047
____________________
Before G RANT, L AGOA, and BRASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard A. Greenberg, appointed counsel for Constantino
Charrez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Charrez’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-13047 Document: 42-1 Date Filed: 08/30/2023 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.