USA v. Freddy Paul Foreman, Jr.

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-12778
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FREDDY PAUL FOREMAN, JR.,
a.k.a. Buckshot,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00006-CG-B-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-12778 Date Filed: 04/26/2022 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 21-12778
Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas B. Walsh, appointed counsel for Freddy Foreman,
Jr., in his appeal of the revocation of his supervised release, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Foreman’s revocation of supervised release and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-12778 Date Filed: 04/26/2022 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --