USA v. Danial Cronkite

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-12032
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DANIAL CRONKITE,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00288-JSM-MAP-8
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-12032 Date Filed: 05/10/2022 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 21-11837
Before J ORDAN, NEWSOM , and BRASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Melissa Fussell, appointed counsel for Danial Cronkite in
this appeal of a sentence following revocation of supervised re-
lease, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is cor-
rect. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Cronkite’s revocation of supervised release and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-12032 Date Filed: 05/10/2022 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --