USA v. William Story

21-11837Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitDec 7, 2021

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-11837
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM STORY,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 5:15-cr-00035-MTT-CHW-22
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-11837 Date Filed: 12/07/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 21-11837
Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Edward Daniels, appointed counsel for William
Story in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Story’s revocation of su-
pervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-11837 Date Filed: 12/07/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.