The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-11354•USA v. Ronald Geddis
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-11354
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RONALD GEDDIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00056-MSS-AEP-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-11354 Date Filed: 12/29/2021 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 21-11354
Before WILSON, BRANCH, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Darlene Geiger, appointed counsel for Ronald Geddis in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw
is GRANTED, and Geddis’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-11354 Date Filed: 12/29/2021 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.