The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-10883•USA v. Hernandez Lopaz Daniels
21-10883Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitSep 3, 2021
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 21-10883
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:03-cr-00016-MW-MAF-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HERNANDEZ LOPAZ DANIELS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(September 3, 2021)
Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 21-10883 Date Filed: 09/03/2021 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Randolph Murrell, counsel for Hernandez Lopaz Daniels in this appeal of
the denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018,
Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404(b), 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (“First Step Act”), has moved
to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s denial of Daniels’s motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act
is AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-10883 Date Filed: 09/03/2021 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.