Full text
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-10315
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MCKENDRICK ARNEZ HARRIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00480-LCB-HNJ-5
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-10315 Date Filed: 01/20/2022 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 21-10315
Before R OSENBAUM , BRANCH , and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William K. Bradford, appointed counsel for McKendrick
Arnez Harris in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to with-
draw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief
pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our inde-
pendent review of the record reveals that Bradford’s assessment
of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harris’s convic-
tion and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-10315 Date Filed: 01/20/2022 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
