The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-14742•USA v. Henry Bullock
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 20-14742
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HENRY BULLOCK,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00012-CEH-CPT-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 20-14742 Date Filed: 10/19/2021 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 20-14742
Before J ORDAN, G RANT, and L UCK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Burns, counsel for Henry Bullock in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representa-
tion of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. Califor-
nia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire rec-
ord reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Bullock’s convictions and sentences
are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-14742 Date Filed: 10/19/2021 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.