USA v. Lathomas Damondrae Tucker

20-13145Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 16, 2021

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-13145
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00481-LCB-HNJ-6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LATHOMAS DAMONDRAE TUCKER,
a.k.a. Daedae Dadon Tucker,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(February 16, 2021)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, MARTIN and BRANCH , Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 20-13145 Date Filed: 02/16/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Alison Wallace, appointed counsel for Lathomas Tucker in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Tucker and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that Wallace’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, Wallace’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Tucker’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-13145 Date Filed: 02/16/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.