USA v. Nicholas Renee Rogers

20-12834Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitApr 1, 2021

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-12834
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00191-VMC-SPF-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NICHOLAS RENEE ROGERS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 1, 2021)
Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Nicholas Rogers in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
USCA11 Case: 20-12834 Date Filed: 04/01/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Rogers’s conviction and total sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-12834 Date Filed: 04/01/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.