USA v. Emmanuel Jimmy Saint-Nattis

20-12736Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJan 11, 2021

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-12736
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:00-cr-00059-CEM-GJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EMMANUEL JIMMY SAINT-NATTIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 11, 2021)
Before WILSON, LUCK and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 20-12736 Date Filed: 01/11/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Charles Taylor, appointed counsel for Emmanuel Saint-Nattis in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Saint-Nattis’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-12736 Date Filed: 01/11/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.