USA v. Tyler Dwayne Waddle

17-12022Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJan 9, 2018

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-12022
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00282-VMC-TGW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TYLER DWAYNE WADDLE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 9, 2018)
Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Tyler Waddle in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
Case: 17-12022 Date Filed: 01/09/2018 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Waddle’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 17-12022 Date Filed: 01/09/2018 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.