USA v. Joseph Andrew Spradlin

17-11629Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJan 10, 2018

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-11629
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:16-cr-00085-SPC-MRM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH SPRADLIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 10, 2018)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, NEWSOM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Joseph Spradlin in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 17-11629 Date Filed: 01/10/2018 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Spradlin’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 17-11629 Date Filed: 01/10/2018 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.