USA v. Jose Solis

16-15670Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJan 9, 2018

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-15670
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00015-CG-N-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE SOLIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(January 9, 2018)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JULIE CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-15670 Date Filed: 01/09/2018 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Andrew M. Jones, appointed counsel for Jose Solis in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Solis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 16-15670 Date Filed: 01/09/2018 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.