USA v. Wendell Carson, III

16-13604Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 24, 2017

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-13604
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00035-SDM-EAJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WENDELL CARSON, III,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(February 24, 2017)
Before HULL, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-13604 Date Filed: 02/24/2017 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Wendell Carson, III, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Carson’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
Case: 16-13604 Date Filed: 02/24/2017 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.