USA v. Darius Brightwell

16-13045Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 27, 2017

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-13045
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:15-cr-00010-CAR-CHW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DARIUS BRIGHTWELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(February 27, 2017)
Before MARTIN, ANDERSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel S. Woodrum, appointed counsel for Darius Brightwell, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a
Case: 16-13045 Date Filed: 02/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Brightwell’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 16-13045 Date Filed: 02/27/2017 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.