USA v. Michael Robert Erskine

16-11665Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 27, 2018

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-11665
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket Nos. 1:14-cr-00274-KD-C-1, 1:15-cr-00079-KD-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL ROBERT ERSKINE,
Defendant - Appellant
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(February 27, 2018)
Before WILSON, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-11665 Date Filed: 02/27/2018 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael Erskine in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
Erskine and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Erskine’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
Case: 16-11665 Date Filed: 02/27/2018 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.