USA v. Tori Ellison

15-13430Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 22, 2016

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-13430
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00057-RH-CAS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TORI ELLISON,
a.k.a. Creep,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(February 22, 2016)
Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-13430 Date Filed: 02/22/2016 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
William Bubsey, appointed counsel for Tori Ellison in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ellison=s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 15-13430 Date Filed: 02/22/2016 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.