USA v. Wayne L. Broderick

15-12466Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMar 9, 2016

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-12466
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00358-JDW-EAJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WAYNE L. BRODERICK,
a.k.a. Bam Bam,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 9, 2016)
Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-12466 Date Filed: 03/09/2016 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel on appeal for Wayne L. Broderick, has
filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Broderick’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 15-12466 Date Filed: 03/09/2016 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.