The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
15-11868•USA v. Adrian Labar Ingram
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-11868
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00043-JRH-BKE-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ADRIAN LABAR INGRAM,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(October 13, 2017)
Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-11868 Date Filed: 10/13/2017 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Martin C. Puetz, retained counsel for Adrian Labar Ingram in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ingram’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
Case: 15-11868 Date Filed: 10/13/2017 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.