The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-14110•Robert Creighton v. U.S. Department of Transportation, et al
14-14110Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 15, 2015
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14110
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
District Court No. 6:13-cv-00907-GKS-TBS
ROBERT CREIGHTON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_______________
(May 15, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Case: 14-14110 Date Filed: 05/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
For the reasons stated in the District Court’s order of July 14, 2014, denying
appellant’s motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rules 60(b)(1) and
(b)(6), we agree that appellant failed to present an adequate basis for granting relief
from the District Court’s judgment due to “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or
excusable neglect,” or “(6) any other reason that justifies relief.” We therefore find
no abuse of discretion in the denial of appellant’s motion.
AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-14110 Date Filed: 05/15/2015 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.