The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-13778•USA v. Lawrence Schechtman
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-13778
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-40
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LAWRENCE SCHECHTMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(June 2, 2015)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-13778 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Lawrence Schechtman in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Schechtman’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-13778 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.