The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-13679•USA v. Cedrick Williams
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-13679
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cr-60167-WJZ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CEDRICK WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(May 8, 2015)
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael B. Cohen, counsel for Cedrick Williams in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Williams and filed a
Case: 14-13679 Date Filed: 05/08/2015 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d
493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Williams’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-13679 Date Filed: 05/08/2015 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.