The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-13503•Bank of America, N.A. v. David Francis Miller, III
14-13503Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitOct 7, 2015
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
___________________________
No. 14-13503
Non-Argument Calendar
___________________________
Docket Nos. 1:14-cv-01377-AT; 13-bkc-77194-BBM
In re: DAVID FRANCIS MILLER, III,
Debtor,
__________________________________________________________________
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DAVID FRANCIS MILLER, III,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
_______________________________
(October 7, 2015)
Case: 14-13503 Date Filed: 10/07/2015 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In this appeal, Bank of America, N.A. challenges the district court’s
summary affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order voiding a wholly unsecured
second priority lien on residential property owned by a Chapter 7 debtor. We kept
the appeal in abeyance pending review by the Supreme Court of our decisions in
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Caulkett (In re Caulkett), 566 F. App’x 879 (11th Cir. 2014),
and in Bank of Am., N.A. v. Toledo-Cardona (In re Toledo-Cardona), 556 F.
App’x 911 (11th Cir. 2014).
Because the Supreme Court has now disposed of these cases in Bank of
America v. Caulkett, 135 S.Ct. 1995 (2015), we grant Bank of America’s motion
to lift the stay of this appeal.
In the light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Caulkett and this Court’s
decision in Waits v. Bank of Am., N.A. (In re Waits), 793 F.3d 1267 (11th Cir.
2015), we deny Bank of America’s motion for summary reversal, vacate the
district court’s judgment, and remand for further proceedings consistent with
Caulkett.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Case: 14-13503 Date Filed: 10/07/2015 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.