The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-13043•USA v. Joseph Wayne King
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-13043
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00457-RDP-TMP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH WAYNE KING,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(April 16, 2015)
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert B. Tuten and Mickey J. Gentle, appointed counsel for Joseph Wayne
King in this direct criminal appeal, have filed a motion to withdraw from further
representation of King, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
Case: 14-13043 Date Filed: 04/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and King’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-13043 Date Filed: 04/16/2015 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.