The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-12406•Bank of America, N.A. v. Bartel James Vander Iest, Jr.
14-12406Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitAug 25, 2014
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12406
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:14-cv-00099-RWS
In Re: BARTEL JAMES VANDER IEST, JR.,
Debtor.
____________________________________________________
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BARTEL JAMES VANDER IEST, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(August 25, 2014)
Case: 14-12406 Date Filed: 08/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The sole issue on this appeal is whether Section 506(d) of the Bankruptcy
Code allows a Chapter 7 debtor to “strip off” a valid junior mortgage lien when the
debt secured by the senior lien exceeds the value of the collateral. Appellant, Bank
of America, N.A., concedes that our precedent in Folendore v. Small Business
Administration, 862 F.2d 1537 (11th Cir. 1989), and McNeal v. GMAC Mortgage,
LLC, 735 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2012), clearly hold that such a lien may be “stripped
off.” (Appellant’s Initial Br. at 4). Consequently, we affirm the judgment of the
district court.
AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-12406 Date Filed: 08/25/2014 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.