The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-12241•USA v. Naba Raheem Lewis
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12241
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00591-RAL-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NABA RAHEEM LEWIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 9, 2015)
Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-12241 Date Filed: 04/09/2015 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Meghan Collins, counsel for Naba Raheem Lewis, has moved to withdraw
from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because our review reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Lewis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-12241 Date Filed: 04/09/2015 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.