The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-11679•USA v. Robert Eugene Spiker
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11679
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00127-MEW-GRJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT EUGENE SPIKER,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 19, 2014)
Before HULL, MARTIN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-11679 Date Filed: 11/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Robert Spiker, has moved to withdraw
from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Spiker’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-11679 Date Filed: 11/19/2014 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.