The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-11510•USA v. Oreste Rolando Chavez
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11510
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-28
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ORESTE ROLANDO CHAVEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(November 5, 2014)
Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert W. Stickney, appointed counsel for Oreste Rolando Chavez, has filed
a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders
Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the defendant’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.