The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-11510•USA v. Oreste Rolando Chavez
14-11510Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitMay 26, 2015
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-11510
Non-Argument Calendar
D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-28
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ORESTE ROLANDO CHAVEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
(May 26, 2015)
Before MARTIN and ANDERSON*, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The prior opinion of the panel is vacated, and this opinion is substituted for
it.
* This order is being entered by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 05/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Robert W. Stickney, appointed counsel for Oreste Rolando Chavez, has
filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the defendant’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 05/26/2015 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.