The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-15379•USA v. Benjamin Caine
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15379
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00011-MMH-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BENJAMIN CAINE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 2, 2014)
Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-15379 Date Filed: 07/02/2014 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Tracy N. DaCruz, counsel for Benjamin Caine, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Caine’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-15379 Date Filed: 07/02/2014 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.