USA v. Michael D. Neely

13-15098Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitJul 10, 2014

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15098
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00009-RS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL D. NEELY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(July 10, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-15098 Date Filed: 07/10/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Michael D. Neely in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Neely’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-15098 Date Filed: 07/10/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.