The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-14527•USA v. Ruffino Torres-Pineda
13-14527Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitNov 12, 2014
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14527
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00328-TCB-LTW-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RUFFINO TORRES-PINEDA,
a.k.a. Nino,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(November 12, 2014)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-14527 Date Filed: 11/12/2014 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
David H. Jones, appointed counsel for Ruffino Torres-Pineda in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
Torres-Pineda and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,
87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Torres-Pineda’s
convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-14527 Date Filed: 11/12/2014 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.