The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-13495•USA v. David T. Conner
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13495
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00055-JRH-BKE-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID T. CONNER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(April 3, 2014)
Before WILSON, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-13495 Date Filed: 04/03/2014 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Andrew Magruder, appointed counsel for David T. Conner in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Conner’s conviction and
sentence is AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-13495 Date Filed: 04/03/2014 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.