USA v. Pedro Calixto-Moran

13-12554Court of Appeals for the Eleventh CircuitFeb 11, 2014

Full text

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12554
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00149-RAL-TGW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PEDRO CALIXTO-MORAN,
a.k.a. Chino,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(February 11, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-12554 Date Filed: 02/11/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Stephen V. Iglesias, appointed counsel for Pedro Calixto-Moran, has moved
to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED,
and Calixto-Moran’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-12554 Date Filed: 02/11/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.